| Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| | | | |
| | == Abstract == | | == Abstract == |
| − | Suppose we are given n buckets with varying integral sizes, and
| + | Network routing games are instrumental in understanding |
| − | wish to fill some fraction alpha of them will balls, with a bucket
| + | traffic patterns and improving congestion in networks. They have a |
| − | of size k being filled as soon as it receives k balls. Our goal is | + | direct application in transportation and telecommunication networks |
| − | to minimize the number of balls used.
| + | and extend to many other applications such as task planning, etc. |
| | + | Theoretically, network games were one of the central examples in the |
| | + | development of algorithmic game theory. |
| | | | |
| − | If we know the sizes of the buckets, this is a trivial problem:
| + | In these games, multiple users need to route between di fferent |
| − | Just identify the (alpha)n smallest buckets, and fill them.
| + | source-destination pairs and links are congestible, namely, each link |
| − | But what if we do not know the sizes of the buckets in advance,
| + | delay is a non-decreasing function of the flow on the link. Many of |
| − | and after each ball placement only find out whether the bucket
| + | the fundamental game theoretic questions are now well understood for |
| − | is now full or not?
| + | these games, for example, does equilibrium exist, is it unique, can it |
| | + | be computed e fficiently, does |
| | + | it have a compact representation; the same questions can be asked of |
| | + | the socially optimal solution that minimizes the total user delay. |
| | | | |
| − | This problem models a cryptographic question. Suppose an adversary
| + | So far, most research has focused on the classical models in which the |
| − | wishes to prevent a multiparty protocol from succeeding. Typically
| + | link delays are deterministic. In contrast, real world applications |
| − | with such protocols, the adversary need only corrupt half (or a third)
| + | contain a lot of uncertainty, which may stem from exogenous factors |
| − | of the parties to attain its goal. But suppose each party is protected
| + | such as weather, time of day, weekday versus weekend, etc. or |
| − | by a sequence of some number of cryptographic walls, each of which
| + | endogenous factors such as the network tra ffic. Furthermore, many |
| − | requires a certain amount of computation to break through. If parties
| + | users are risk-averse in the presence of uncertainty, so that they do |
| − | have differing numbers of walls, and the adversary does not know how
| + | not simply want to minimize expected delays and instead may need to |
| − | many walls a given party has until it breaks through the last one,
| + | add a bu ffer to ensure a guaranteed arrival time to a destination. |
| − | we get our balls-and-buckets problem.
| |
| | | | |
| − | This cryptographic connection is formalized in a paper I've written
| + | I present my recent work on a new stochastic network game model with |
| − | with Juan Garay, Aggelos Kiayis, and Moti Yung. Here I will concentrate
| + | risk-averse users. Risk-aversion poses a computational challenge and |
| − | on the combinatorial side, giving algorithms for the adversary (bucket
| + | it often fundamentally alters the mathematical structure of the game |
| − | filler) in the presence various levels of partial information about the
| + | compared to its deterministic counterpart, requiring new tools for |
| − | sizes, and near-matching lower bounds on what is possible, both for
| + | analysis. The talk will discuss best response and equilibrium |
| − | deterministic and randomized algorithms. I also address the question
| + | analysis, as well as equilibrium efficiency (price of anarchy) and a |
| − | of how a system-designer can best spend his security dollars (in wall | + | new concept, the price of risk. |
| − | building) in the hidden diversity setting.
| + | |
| | + | One relevant paper is here: |
| | + | http://faculty.cse.tamu.edu/nikolova/papers/Stochastic-selfish-routing-full.pdf |
| | + | A short summary of the paper is here: |
| | + | http://www.sigecom.org/exchanges/volume_11/1/NIKOLOVA.pdf |