Anonymous

Changes

From Theory
2 bytes added ,  23:35, 31 March 2013
Line 6: Line 6:     
== Abstract ==
 
== Abstract ==
Consider a graph G=(V,E) with a weight value w(v) associated with each vertex v. A demand is a pair of vertices (s,t). A subgraph H satisfies the demand if s and t are connected in H. In the (offline) node-weighted Steiner forest problem, given a set of demands the goal is to find the minimum-weight subgraph H which satisfies all demands.
+
/*Consider a graph G=(V,E) with a weight value w(v) associated with each vertex v. A demand is a pair of vertices (s,t). A subgraph H satisfies the demand if s and t are connected in H. In the (offline) node-weighted Steiner forest problem, given a set of demands the goal is to find the minimum-weight subgraph H which satisfies all demands.
    
We give the first non-trivial approximation algorithm for the prize-collecting variant of the problem. In the prize-collecting variant, a penalty is associated with each demand. If the subgraph does not satisfy a demand, we need to pay the penalty of the demand. Our algorithm has a logarithmic approximation ratio which is tight up to a constant factor. Indeed our algorithm simplifies and generalizes the previous results for the prize-collecting node-weighted Steiner tree problem.
 
We give the first non-trivial approximation algorithm for the prize-collecting variant of the problem. In the prize-collecting variant, a penalty is associated with each demand. If the subgraph does not satisfy a demand, we need to pay the penalty of the demand. Our algorithm has a logarithmic approximation ratio which is tight up to a constant factor. Indeed our algorithm simplifies and generalizes the previous results for the prize-collecting node-weighted Steiner tree problem.