| Line 18: |
Line 18: |
| | == Abstract == | | == Abstract == |
| | The first part of this talk focuses on a network diffusion model | | The first part of this talk focuses on a network diffusion model |
| − | that was recently introduced by Goldberg & Liu (SODA'13). Goldberg &
| + | that was recently introduced by Goldberg & Liu (SODA'13). Goldberg & |
| − | Liu's model adapts the earlier linear threshold model of Kempe,
| + | Liu's model adapts the earlier linear threshold model of Kempe, |
| − | Kleinberg & Tardos (KDD'03) in an effort to capture aspects of
| + | Kleinberg & Tardos (KDD'03) in an effort to capture aspects of |
| − | technology adaptation processes in networks. We present new,
| + | technology adaptation processes in networks. We present new, |
| − | improved, yet simple algorithms for the so called Influence
| + | improved, yet simple algorithms for the so called Influence |
| − | Maximization problem in this setting.
| + | Maximization problem in this setting. |
| | | | |
| − | A key component of our algorithm is a Langrangean multiplier
| + | A key component of our algorithm is a Langrangean multiplier |
| − | preserving (LMP) algorithm for the Prize-collecting Node-weighted
| + | preserving (LMP) algorithm for the Prize-collecting Node-weighted |
| − | Steiner Tree problem (PC-NWST). This problem had been studied in
| + | Steiner Tree problem (PC-NWST). This problem had been studied in |
| − | prior work by Moss and Rabani (STOC'01 & SICOMP'07) who presented a
| + | prior work by Moss and Rabani (STOC'01 & SICOMP'07) who presented a |
| − | primal-dual O(log |V|) approximate and LMP algorithm, and showed
| + | primal-dual O(log |V|) approximate and LMP algorithm, and showed |
| − | that this is best possible unless NP=P.
| + | that this is best possible unless NP=P. |
| | | | |
| − | We demonstrate that Moss & Rabani's algorithm for PC-NWST is
| + | We demonstrate that Moss & Rabani's algorithm for PC-NWST is |
| − | seriously flawed. We then present a new, fundamentally different
| + | seriously flawed. We then present a new, fundamentally different |
| − | primal-dual method achieving the same performance guarantee. Our
| + | primal-dual method achieving the same performance guarantee. Our |
| − | algorithm introduces several novel features to the primal-dual
| + | algorithm introduces several novel features to the primal-dual |
| − | method that may be of independent interest.
| + | method that may be of independent interest. |
| | | | |
| − | Joint work with Laura Sanita and Sina Sadeghian
| + | Joint work with Laura Sanita and Sina Sadeghian |